Fluoridation: Forced Medical Treatment?
Fluoridation of the water supply remains a hotly debated issue. Scientists against fluoridation claim it is forced medical treatment. Whether you want it or not, you’re forced to have it in your water. And, like drugs, they say, the seriousness of hte side effects do not warrant such haphazard use of a substance know to be toxic to human beings.
So why does your dentist insist on giving you fluoride? Is he/she ignorant of its harmful effects, or does he/she just believe propaganda that we all need it?
An article called “U.S. Dentists “Unaware” of Recent Fluoride Research,” states:
When water fluoridation was first introduced en masse in the 1950s, dentists argued that fluoride needed to be ingested by children — while their teeth are developing — in order to be effective. This argument, which also underpinned the introduction of fluoride drops and pills, was based on the belief that ingested fluoride would accumulate in developing teeth and make the “fluoride-enriched” teeth stronger for life. Over the past 30 years, however, this theory has been put to the test and almost unanimously rejected by dental researchers (Featherstone 2000; Fejerskov 2004). A new theory has taken its place: Fluoride’s primary benefits do not come from being swallowed, but come instead from being applied topically to the outside of the tooth while in the mouth.
While the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) was late in coming to terms with this new paradigm on fluoride, it finally came on board in 1999. According to a 1999 report issued by the CDC, fluoride’s actions “primarily are topical for both adults and children.” CDC repeated this position again in 2001, stating: “fluoride’s predominant effect is posteruptive and topical.”
The implications of this new consensus are as obvious as they are important: If fluoride has little benefit when swallowed, there is no need for a fluoride chemical to ever make it past the mouth and into the bloodstream. As noted by the recent Nobel Laureate in Medicine, Dr. Arvid Carlsson, “in pharmacology, if the effect is local, it’s awkward to use it in any other way than as a local treatment. I mean this is obvious. You have the teeth there, they’re available for you, why drink the stuff?”
Click here to read more from Fluoride Action Network
Enjoy this Article? Get More in our Weekly Newsletter
Sign up to receive Weekly Health Tips + Special Product Offers - FREE!
PLUS, Get a Coupon for $5 OFF at our Online Store just for signing up!
Want to see some of our past newsletters before signing up? Click here.
















Add Your Comment